Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16337438›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2006

Closely opposed apurinic/apyrimidinic sites are converted to double strand breaks in Escherichia coli even in the absence of exonuclease III, endonuclease IV, nucleotide excision repair and AP lyase cleavage.

Lynn Harrison, Katherine L Brame, Laura E Geltz, April M Landry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Base excision repair inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Influence of 5'Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynn HarrisonDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA. lclary@lsuhsc.edu
Katherine L Brame
Laura E Geltz
April M Landry
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · US

Funding

DNA REPAIR OF MULTIPLY DAMAGED SITES IN CELLSR01CA085693 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI HARRISON, LYNN · 2000 to 2010
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA 85693NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiply damaged sites (MDSs) consist of two or more damages within 20 base pairs (bps) and are introduced into DNA by ionizing radiation. Using a plasmid assay, we previously demonstrated that repair in Escherichia coli generated a double strand break (DSB) from two closely opposed uracils when uracil DNA glycosylase initiated repair. To identify the enzymes that converted the resulting apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites to DSBs, repair was examined in bacteria deficient in AP site cleavage. Since exonuclease III (xth) and endonuclease IV (nfo) mutant bacteria were able to introduce DSBs at the MDSs, we generated unique bacterial mutants deficient in UvrA, Xth and Nfo. However, the additional disruption of nucleotide excision repair (NER) did not prevent DSB formation. xth- nfo- nfi- bacteria also converted the MDSs to DSBs, ruling out endonuclease V as the candidate AP endonuclease. By using MDSs containing tetrahydrofuran (an AP site analog), it was determined that even in the absence of Xth, Nfo, NER and AP lyase cleavage, DSBs were formed from closely opposed AP sites. This finding implies that there is an unknown enzyme/repair pathway for MDSs, and multiple underlying repair systems in cells that can process closely opposed DNA damage into lethal lesions following exposure to ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

DNA RepairBinding SitesDeoxyribonuclease IV (Phage T4-Induced)Deoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)DNADNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA DamageEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsPurinesPyrimidine DimersPyrimidinesUltraviolet RaysDeoxyribonuclease IV (Phage T4-Induced)Deoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)DNADNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyaseendonuclease IV, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsNTH protein, E coliPurinesPyrimidine DimersPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID16337438
PMCPMC1704278
OpenAlexW2000149072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.