Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16336551›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2005

Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.

Dan R Berlowitz, Arlene S Ash, Mark Glickman, Robert H Friedman, Leonard M Pogach, Audrey L Nelson, Ashley T Wong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00012675 (Developing and Implementing a Quality Measure for Glycemic Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00012675 withdrawnnot on this map

Developing and Implementing a Quality Measure for Glycemic Control

TypeobservationalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsEnrolled0ConditionsDiabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Observational
  15. Psychiatric disorders and pain treatment in community nursing homes.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Factors associated with clinical inertia: an integrative review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dan R BerlowitzENRM VA Hospital, Bedford, MA 01730, USA.
Arlene S Ash
Mark Glickman
Robert H Friedman
Leonard M Pogach
Audrey L Nelson
Ashley T Wong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a valid quality measure that captures clinical inertia, the failure to initiate or intensify therapy in response to medical need, in diabetes care and to link this process measure with outcomes of glycemic control. DATA SOURCES: Existing databases from 13 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals between 1997 and 1999. STUDY

designLaboratory results, medications, and diagnoses were collected on 23,291 patients with diabetes. We modeled the decision to increase antiglycemic medications at individual visits. We then aggregated all visits for individual patients and calculated a treatment intensity score by comparing the observed number of increases to that expected based on our model. The association between treatment intensity and two measures of glycemic control, change in HbA1c during the observation period, and whether the outcome glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was greater than 8 percent, was then examined. PRINCIPAL

findingsIncreases in antiglycemic medications occurred at only 9.8 percent of visits despite 39 percent of patients having an initial HbA1c level greater than 8 percent. A clinically credible model predicting increase in therapy was developed with the principal predictor being a recent HbA1c greater than 8 percent. There were considerable differences in the intensity of therapy received by patients. Those patients receiving more intensive therapy had greater improvements in control (p < .001).

conclusionsClinical inertia can be measured in diabetes care and this process measure is linked to patient outcomes of glycemic control. This measure may be useful in efforts to improve clinicians management of patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareAgedComorbidityDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusDrug UtilizationFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexUnited StatesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID16336551
PMCPMC1361229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.