ArticlePharmacoEconomics2005
Modelling the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the management of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rapid health technology assessment of galantamine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A review.Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease.PharmacoEconomics · 2016Pooled it
- The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Health state values for use in the economic evaluation of treatments for Alzheimer's disease.Drugs & aging · 2012Pooled it
- Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2007Pooled it
- In Silico Design of Dual-Binding Site Anti-Cholinesterase Phytochemical Heterodimers as Treatment Options for Alzheimer's Disease.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- Anti-Cholinesterase Combination Drug Therapy as a Potential Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Family and Caregiver Spillover Effects in Cost-Utility Analyses of Alzheimer's Disease Interventions.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Article
- Potential cost savings to be made by slowing cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia using a model derived from the UK GERAS observational study.BMC geriatrics · 2018Observational
- An economic model of advance care planning in Australia: a cost-effective way to respect patient choice.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Evaluating the cost effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Germany using discrete event simulation.BMC neurology · 2012Article
- Allosteric modulation of related ligand-gated ion channels synergistically induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus and enhances cognition.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2011Article
- Dependence as a unifying construct in defining Alzheimer's disease severity.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2010Review
- Savings from sub-groups?: Policy guidance and Alzheimer's disease treatments.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010Article
- Alzheimer's disease: the strength of association of costs with different measures of disease severity.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010Review
- Cost-effectiveness of drug therapies for Alzheimer's disease: A brief review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2008Article
- A markov model of the cost effectiveness of olanzapine treatment for agitation and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease.Clinical drug investigation · 2008Article
- Is long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy justified?Drugs & aging · 2007Review
- Progress update: Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the cost effectiveness (from the UK NHS and personal social services perspective) of the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine compared with usual care in the treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. Patients had a mean age of 74 years, a mean disease duration of 1 year and a mean Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale score of 24.
methodsA pharmacoeconomic model was used to predict long-term outcomes over a 5-year time horizon and to estimate the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors for the management of Alzheimer's disease. The model structure is informed by a systematic review of the literature on the clinical and cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and a review of the literature on the costs and outcomes associated with treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The main outcome measure used was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. All healthcare costs (excluding cholinesterase inhibitor costs) were indexed to pounds sterling (2003 values). Drug costs are 2005 values. Multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were undertaken to assess uncertainty in the results.
resultsThe clinical benefits on cognition from treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors resulted in an incremental cost per QALY gained ranging from 53,780 pounds sterling to 74,735 pounds sterling, over 5 years (vs usual care). Uncertainty analysis suggests that the probability of any of these treatments having an incremental cost per QALY of < 30,000 pounds sterling is < 21%. The key determinants of cost effectiveness were the effectiveness of treatment, the mean treatment cost and the cost savings associated with an expected delay in disease progression.
conclusionsResults presented in this paper suggest that the use of cholinesterase inhibitors may not be a cost-effective use of NHS resources. Guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE) in the UK on their judgements surrounding the acceptability of technologies as an effective use of resources, indicates there would need to be special reasons for accepting cholinesterase inhibitors as a cost-effective use of NHS resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16336020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.