ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2005
Highlighting protein kinase CK2 movement in living cells.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence for aggregation of protein kinase CK2 in the cell: a novel strategy for studying CK2 holoenzyme interaction by BRET(2).Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2014Article
- Protein kinase CK2 contributes to the organization of sodium channels in axonal membranes by regulating their interactions with ankyrin G.The Journal of cell biology · 2008Article
- Casein kinase 2 binds to the C terminus of Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3) and stimulates NHE3 basal activity by phosphorylating a separate site in NHE3.Molecular biology of the cell · 2008Article
- Structure-based design of small peptide inhibitors of protein kinase CK2 subunit interaction.The Biochemical journal · 2007Article
- A global view of CK2 function and regulation.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein kinase CK2 has traditionally been described as a stable heterotetrameric complex (alpha2beta2) but new approaches that effectively capture the dynamic behavior of proteins, are bringing a new picture of this complex into focus. To track the spatio-temporal dynamics of CK2 in living cells, we fused its catalytic alpha and regulatory beta subunits with GFP and analog proteins. Beside the mostly nuclear localization of both subunits, and the identification of specific domains on each subunit that triggers their localization, the most significant finding was that the association of both CK2 subunits in a stable tetrameric holoenzyme eliminates their nuclear import (Mol Cell Biol 23: 975-987, 2003). Molecular movements of both subunits in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus were analyzed using different new and updated fluorescence imaging methods such as: fluorescence recovery after photo bleaching (FRAP), fluorescence loss in photo bleaching (FLIP), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), and photoactivation using a biphoton microscope. These fluorescence-imaging techniques provide unprecedented ways to visualize and quantify the mobility of each individual CK2 subunit with high spatial and temporal resolution. Visualization of CK2 heterotetrameric complex formation could also be recorded using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technique. FRET imaging revealed that the assembling of this molecular complex can take place both in the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments. The spatio-temporal organization of individual CK2 subunits and their dynamic behavior remain now to be correlated with the functioning of this kinase in the complex environment of the cell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.