Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16333091›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Rapid determination of rifampin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by real-time PCR.

Tanil Kocagoz, Zeynep Saribas, Alpaslan Alp

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Distribution and Frequency ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  4. Rapid Detection of Rifampicin- and Isoniazid-ResistantJundishapur journal of microbiology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanil KocagozDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Zeynep Saribas
Alpaslan Alp
Hacettepe University · TRYeditepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time PCR was used to determine rifampin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ninety-six rifampin-resistant isolates and 23 rifampin-susceptible isolates were included in the study. A 305-bp region covering the 81-bp "rifampin resistance-determining region" of rpoB was amplified. Two hybridization probe pairs that covered the most frequent mutation sites in rpoB, codon regions 526 to 531 and 513 to 516, were used. The results obtained by real-time PCR were compared to those obtained by the proportion method. For detection of rifampin resistance, the real-time PCR assay yielded a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 100%. Real-time PCR is a very rapid method, and it can be especially helpful for the reporting of resistant clinical isolates in a very short period of time.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionRifampinTime FactorsTransition TemperatureTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRifampinrpoB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID16333091
PMCPMC1317190
OpenAlexW2106960881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.