Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16332966›Full record

ReviewBlood2006

Scientific and clinical opportunities for modeling blood disorders with embryonic stem cells.

M William Lensch, George Q Daley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M William LenschDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
George Q Daley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our considerable wealth of data concerning hematologic processes has come despite difficulties working with stem and progenitor cells in vitro and their propensity to differentiate. Key methodologies that have sought to overcome such limitations include transgenic/knock-out animals and in vitro studies using murine embryonic stem cells, because both permit investigation of the formation of hematopoietic tissue from nonhematopoietic precursors. Although there have been many successful studies in model animals for understanding hematopoietic-cell development, differences between lower vertebrates and humans have left gaps in our understanding. Clearly, human-specific strategies to study the onset of hematopoiesis, particularly the earliest events leading to the specification of both normal and abnormal hematopoietic tissue, could bring an investigational renaissance. The recent availability of human embryonic stem (hES) cells suggests that such a system is now at hand. This review highlights the potential of hES cells to model human hematologic processes in vitro with an emphasis on disease targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineDisease Models, AnimalHematologic DiseasesHematopoiesisHumansPluripotent Stem CellsStem CellsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID16332966
PMCPMC1895374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.