Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16332491›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2005

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia: possible detrimental role of previous endoscopic treatment.

Giuseppe Portale, Mario Costantini, Christian Rizzetto, Emanuela Guirroli, Martina Ceolin, Renato Salvador, Ermanno Ancona, Giovanni Zaninotto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Significance of limited hiatal dissection in surgery for achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Thousand and One Laparoscopic Heller Myotomies for Esophageal Achalasia: a 25-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Center.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Surgical treatment of achalasia - endoscopic or laparoscopic? : Proposal for a tailored approach].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Article
  13. Mucosal Perforation During Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Has No Influence on Final Treatment Outcome.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Article
  14. Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in children: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016
    Review
  15. Endoscopic treatment of esophageal achalasia.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016
    Article
  16. Therapeutic options in oesophageal dysphagia.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015
    Review
  17. [Diagnostics and therapy of achalasia].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Review
  18. Analysis of a learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM).Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is safe and effective in the setting of prior endoscopic intervention.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuseppe PortaleDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Clinica Chirurgica III, University of Padova School of Medicine, Padova, Italy.
Mario Costantini
Christian Rizzetto
Emanuela Guirroli
Martina Ceolin
Renato Salvador
Ermanno Ancona
Giovanni Zaninotto
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy has recently emerged as the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia. Previous unsuccessful treatments (pneumatic dilations or botulinum toxin [BT] injections) can make surgery more difficult, causing a higher risk of mucosal perforation and jeopardizing the outcome. The study goal was to evaluate the effects of prior endoscopic treatments on laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Between January 1992 and February 2005, 248 patients (130 males and 118 females; median age, 43 years) underwent a laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for achalasia: 203 underwent primary surgery (group A), 19 had been previously treated with pneumatic dilations (group B), and 26 had BT injections (alone [22] or with dilations [4] (group C)). Median duration of the operation and rate of intraoperative mucosal lesions were not different in the three groups. Median follow-up was 41 months. The 5-year actuarial of control of dysphagia was similar in groups A (86%) and B (94%), whereas only 75% of group C patients were symptom free at 5 years (P = 0.02). On logistic regression analysis, prior treatment with two BT injections or BT combined with dilation was associated with poor outcome of surgery. Further, dilations for surgical failure patients were effective in 80% of group A but in only 33% of group B or C patients. Heller-Dor surgery is safe and effective as a primary or a second-line treatment (after pneumatic dilations or BT injections) for achalasia. However, long-term results seem less satisfactory in patients previously treated with BT.

Indexed as

EsophagoscopyLaparoscopyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildEsophageal AchalasiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16332491
OpenAlexW2073184750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.