Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16328851›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging

Clinical validation of the gated blood pool SPECT QBS processing software in congestive heart failure patients: correlation with MUGA, first-pass RNV and 2D-echocardiography.

Marcus Hacker, Xaver Hoyer, Sandra Kupzyk, Christian La Fougere, Johann Kois, Hans-Ulrich Stempfle, Reinhold Tiling, Klaus Hahn, Stefan Störk

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM/ESC guidelines for radionuclide imaging of cardiac function.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2008
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advanced Imaging Modalities to Monitor for Cardiotoxicity.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  5. Comprehensive review on cardio-oncology: Role of multimodality imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  6. Comparison of biventricular ejection fractions using cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT and planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Gated tomographic radionuclide angiography using cadmium-zinc-telluride detector gamma camera; comparison to traditional gamma cameras.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Positron emission tomography in the assessment of left ventricular function in healthy rats: a comparison of four imaging methods.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Utility of prechemotherapy echocardiographical assessment of cardiac abnormalities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus HackerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. marcus.hacker@med.uni-muenchen.de
Xaver Hoyer
Sandra Kupzyk
Christian La Fougere
Johann Kois
Hans-Ulrich Stempfle
Reinhold Tiling
Klaus Hahn
Stefan Störk
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLeft (LVEF) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) as well as LV regional wall motion at rest are valuable tools to monitor and tailor treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Gated blood pool SPECT (GBPS) is under evaluation as an "all-in-one" technique, providing information on LVEF, RVEF, and wall motion derived from a single examination. Aim of the study was to evaluate a commercially available automated GBPS processing software for EF measurements and wall motion analysis in heart failure patients.

methodsThirty-two patients (12 female; mean age+/-SD: 53+/-13 years), suffering from dilated (63%), ischemic (25%) or hypertrophic (13%) cardiomyopathy, were studied. First-pass radionuclide ventriculography (FP-RNV), planar multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA), and GBPS were performed at rest after in vivo labeling of red blood cells, and LVEF and RVEF was calculated with each method. Later on the same day LVEF was calculated by echocardiography. LV wall motion (summed motion score and wall motion index) was derived from GBPS and echocardiography using the standard 16-segment model.

resultsMean LVEF measured by GBPS, echocardiography, MUGA and FP-RNV was 33+/-13%, 37+/-15%, 41+/-14% and 45+/-13%, respectively. LVEF values calculated from GBPS showed moderate to good correlation with FP-RNV (r=0.61), MUGA (r=0.65) and ECHO (r=0.74; all p<0.01). Mean RVEF calculated by GBPS, FP-RNV and MUGA was 45+/-14%, 46+/-9% and 38+/-9%, respectively. RVEF values calculated from GBPS showed weak correlation with FP-RNV (r=0.33) and MUGA (r=0.26; all p=n.s.). Assessment of GBPS wall motion was qualitatively possible in all patients. The agreement between GBPS and ECHO was 82% (kappa=0.73). The wall motion index showed good correlation between both methods (r=0.88; p<0.001).

conclusionAn automated algorithm for LVEF calculation and wall motion analysis using GBPS is feasible for clinical routine diagnostic in CHF patients. The RVEF calculation method needs to be improved before routine clinical application can be recommended.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyGated Blood-Pool ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSoftwareTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentriculography, First-PassAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID16328851
OpenAlexW2166771648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.