ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2006
[Congenital ectropion in ichthyosis congenita mitis and gravis].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical Treatments for Rare Genetic Dermatological Diseases: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Spontaneous bilateral corneal perforation in a patient with ichthyosis.International ophthalmology · 2014Article
- [Lagophthalmos and ectropion of the upper eyelids in congenital ichthyosis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2013Article
- Cicatricial upper and lower eyelid ectropion in an ichthyosis patient. Surgical correction.Journal of dermatological case reports · 2011Article
- [Surgical management of ectropion].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital ichthyosis is a generalized hyperkeratinization of the skin at birth. Depending on clinical aspects and severity, three forms of congenital ichthyosis have been defined: mitis, tarda, and gravis. Desquamation of the parchment-like hyperkeratinized skin begins shortly after birth and may require several weeks to complete. Skin alterations in the eyelid cause shortening of the anterior lamella, subsequently resulting in ectropion. This affects the upper eyelid more often than the lower and can lead to complications such as chronic palpebral or bulbar conjunctivitis and keratinization or exposure keratopathy. Here we present two case reports illustrating the course of ichthyosis congenita mitis and gravis. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatient 1 (ichthyosis congenita mitis): a male baby prematurely born at 34+2 weeks of gestation was delivered by cesarean section. The entire body was covered by a parchment-like hyperkeratinized skin. Both eyes showed ectropion of the upper and the lower eyelid, which was more obvious with enforced lid closure. Frequent application of external ointment and spontaneous desquamation led to resolution of the ectropion. Patient 2 (ichthyosis congenita gravis): a male baby prematurely born at 35+4 weeks of gestation was delivered by cesarean section. At birth the child showed the signs of a collodion baby with ectropion of all four eyelids in combination with a characteristic "fish mouth" and rudimentary external ears. The child died on the 14th day of life of septicaemia.
conclusionIn mild forms of congenital ichthyosis surgical treatment of eyelid ectropion is not required. In more severe cases a skin graft may become necessary. Various although limited sources of graft material which are discussed can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.