Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16328479›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2006

A fast algorithm for the construction of universal footprinting templates in DNA.

James W Anderson, Keith R Fox, Graham A Niblo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James W AndersonSchool of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom. j.w.anderson@soton.ac.uk
Keith R Fox
Graham A Niblo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce and give a complete description of a new graph to be used for DNA sequencing questions. This graph has the advantage over the classical de Bruijn graph that it fully accounts for the double stranded nature of DNA, rather than dealing with single strands. Technically, our graph may be thought of as the quotient of the de Bruijn graph under the natural involution of sending a DNA strand to its complementary strand. However, this involution has fixed points, and this complicates the structure of the quotient graph which we have therefore modified herein. As an application and motivating example, we give an efficient algorithm for constructing universal footprinting templates for n-mers. This problem may be formulated as the task of finding a shortest possible segment of DNA which contains every possible sequence of base pairs of some fixed length n. Previous work by Kwan et al has attacked this problem from a numerical point of view and generated minimal length universal footprinting templates for n = 2, 3, 5, 7, together with unsubstantiated candidates for the case n = 4. We show that their candidates for n = 4 are indeed minimal length universal footprinting templates.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase PairingDNADNA FootprintingOligodeoxyribonucleotidesSequence Analysis, DNADNAOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.