Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16328282›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2006

Influence of sensory deprivation and perturbation of trigeminal afferent fibers on corticomotor control of human tongue musculature.

L Halkjaer, B Melsen, A S McMillan, P Svensson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L HalkjaerDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
B Melsen
A S McMillan
P Svensson
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have demonstrated changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in human limb muscles following modulation of sensory afferent inputs, but little is known about the regulation of the human tongue motor control. To test the effect of local anesthesia (LA) of the lingual nerve and topical application of capsaicin stimulation on tongue MEPs. Fourteen volunteers participated (21-30 years) in two randomized sessions; before, during a nerve block of the lingual nerve or topical capsaicin application (30 microl 5%) on the tongue, and after anesthesia or pain had subsided. EMG electrodes were placed on the tongue and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle (control). EMG signals were amplified, filtered (20 Hz-1 kHz), and sampled at 4 kHz (Nicolet, USA). TMS were delivered with a figure-of-eight coil (Magstim 200, UK). Scalp sites at which EMG responses were evoked in the relaxed tongue or FDI at the lowest stimulus strength were determined, i.e., motor threshold (T). MEPs were assessed using stimulus-response curves in steps of 10% T. Eight stimuli were presented at each stimulus level. The proximal hypoglossal nerve was activated by TMS delivered over the parieto-occipital skull distal to the right ear. Eight stimuli were delivered at 50% of maximum stimulator output. ANOVAs were used to analyze latency and peak-to-peak amplitudes. Capsaicin evoked mild pain (2.8+/-0.5), and a strong burning sensation (6.2+/-0.4) on 0-10 visual analogue scales. MEP amplitudes in tongue and FDI were not influenced by capsaicin (P>0.44) but by stimulus strength (P<0.001). MEP latencies in tongue (8.9+/-0.2 ms) and FDI (22.4+/-0.4 ms) were not affected by capsaicin (P>0.19). Hypoglossal nerve stimulation evoked a short-latency (3.6+/-0.9 ms) response (mean amplitude 65+/-9 microV); but was unaffected by capsaicin (P>0.54). LA did not have any effect on FDI MEPs but was associated with a significant facilitation of tongue MEPs at T+50% and T+60% about 50 min after the nerve block in the recovery phase. Also in this condition, the direct motor responses evoked by hypoglossal nerve stimulation remained constant. No direct effect of a strong burning sensation could be shown on peripheral or central corticomotor pathways to the relaxed tongue musculature, however, LA of the lingual nerve (cranial nerve V) seems able to induce a delayed change in corticomotor control of tongue musculature (cranial nerve XII) possibly related to unmasking effects at the cortical level but not completely excluding excitability changes at the brain stem level.

Indexed as

AdultAfferent PathwaysAnesthetics, LocalCapsaicinEfferent PathwaysElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansHypoglossal NerveLingual NerveMaleMotor CortexMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNociceptorsAnesthetics, LocalCapsaicin

Identifiers

PMID16328282
OpenAlexW1972625881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.