ArticleNeuroscience and behavioral physiology2006
The protective effect of vipera raddei venom on peripheral nerve damage.
Article in Neuroscience and behavioral physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute experiments were performed on spinal rats to study the protective actions of Vipera raddei venom after section of the sciatic nerve. Individual spike activity was recorded from interneurons and motoneurons in the lumbar segment of the spinal cord, induced by stimulation of the sciatic nerve and the extensor (gastrocnemius) and flexor (peroneus communis) nerves on the lesioned and symmetrical intact sides in controls and after daily injections of venom for four weeks. In animals not treated with Vipera raddei venom, the lesioned side lacked interneuron and motoneuron responses to stimulation of the extensor and flexor nerves of the distal stump, though these were present on stimulation of the contralateral side; responses were the inverse of this on the intact side, due to the failure of the proximal and distal stumps to fuse, as also demonstrated by atrophy of the distal stump of the sciatic nerve and the absence of movement activity in the lesioned limb. Treatment with Vipera raddei venom led to restoration, by four weeks, of interneuron and motoneuron responses on the lesioned side on stimulation of the ipsilateral nerves and on the intact side by stimulation of the contralateral nerves; this is the result of apparent fusion of the proximal and distal stumps of the lesioned nerve. Further evidence for this was hypertrophy of the distal stump and restoration of movement activity in the lesioned limb. These results show that Vipera raddei venom has potential for use in regenerating damaged peripheral nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.