Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16322573›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2006

Comparison of SUMO fusion technology with traditional gene fusion systems: enhanced expression and solubility with SUMO.

Jeffrey G Marblestone, Suzanne C Edavettal, Yiting Lim, Peter Lim, Xun Zuo, Tauseef R Butt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A scalable recombinant pipeline for disulphide-stapled peptides.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A Plug-and-Play Platform for Customizing Multivalent Degraders and Degrader-Drug Conjugates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. EstablishingBiodesign research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biosynthesis of lanosterol inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. RadicalNature catalysis · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeffrey G MarblestoneLifeSensors Inc., 271 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Suzanne C Edavettal
Yiting Lim
Peter Lim
Xun Zuo
Tauseef R Butt

Funding

SUMO Fusions to Enhance Expression and Secretion of ProtiensR44GM068404 · NIGMS · LIFESENSORS, INC. · PI BUTT, TAUSEEF R. · 2006 to 2007
$1.1M
Multivalent Antigen Expression and Vaccine for MalariaR43AI051752 · NIAID · LIFESENSORS, INC. · PI BUTT, TAUSEEF R. · 2002 to 2003
$637k
SUMO Fusions to Enhance Protein Expression &SecretionR43GM068404 · NIGMS · LIFESENSORS, INC. · PI BUTT, TAUSEEF R. · 2003 to 2004
$369k
Secretion of Ubiquitin-fusion ProteinsR43HL069744 · NHLBI · LIFESENSORS, INC. · PI BUTT, TAUSEEF R. · 2001 to 2002
$327k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL69744NIAID NIH HHS AI51752-01/02NIGMS NIH HHS GM 068404-01NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM068404NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM068404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of numerous gene fusion systems, recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli remains difficult. Establishing the best fusion partner for difficult-to-express proteins remains empirical. To determine which fusion tags are best suited for difficult-to-express proteins, a comparative analysis of the newly described SUMO fusion system with a variety of commonly used fusion systems was completed. For this study, three model proteins, enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13), and myostatin (growth differentiating factor-8, GDF8), were fused to the C termini of maltose-binding protein (MBP), glutathione S-transferase (GST), thioredoxin (TRX), NUS A, ubiquitin (Ub), and SUMO tags. These constructs were expressed in E. coli and evaluated for expression and solubility. As expected, the fusion tags varied in their ability to produce tractable quantities of soluble eGFP, MMP13, and GDF8. SUMO and NUS A fusions enhanced expression and solubility of recombinant proteins most dramatically. The ease at which SUMO and NUS A fusion tags were removed from their partner proteins was then determined. SUMO fusions are cleaved by the natural SUMO protease, while an AcTEV protease site had to be engineered between NUS A and its partner protein. A kinetic analysis showed that the SUMO and AcTEV proteases had similar KM values, but SUMO protease had a 25-fold higher kcat than AcTEV protease, indicating a more catalytically efficient enzyme. Taken together, these results demonstrate that SUMO is superior to commonly used fusion tags in enhancing expression and solubility with the distinction of generating recombinant protein with native sequences.

Indexed as

Gene FusionCloning, MolecularCysteine EndopeptidasesEndopeptidasesEscherichia coliHumansRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSolubilitySUMO-1 ProteinCysteine EndopeptidasesEndopeptidasesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSENP6 protein, humanSUMO-1 ProteinTEV protease

Identifiers

PMID16322573
PMCPMC2242369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.