Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16322518›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Recombination in Thermotoga: implications for species concepts and biogeography.

Camilla L Nesbø, Marlena Dlutek, W Ford Doolittle

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The fall and rise of group BMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  4. Complete genome sequence ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The genus Thermotoga: recent developments.Environmental technology · 2010
    Article
  16. Mosaic graphs and comparative genomics in phage communities.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. On the chimeric nature, thermophilic origin, and phylogenetic placement of the Thermotogales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camilla L NesbøDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1X5, Canada. cnesbo@dal.ca
Marlena Dlutek
W Ford Doolittle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we characterize regions of the genomes of eight members of the hyperthermophilic genus Thermotoga. These bacteria differ from each other physiologically and by 3-20% in gene content and occupy physically distinct environments in widely disparate regions of the globe. Among the four different lineages (represented by nine different strains) that we compare, no two are closer than 96% in the average sequences of their genes. By most accepted recent definitions these are different "ecotypes" and different "species." And yet we find compelling evidence for recombination between them. We suggest that no single prokaryotic species concept can accommodate such uncoupling of ecotypic and genetic aspects of cohesion and diversity, and that without a single concept, the question of whether or not prokaryotic species might in general be cosmopolitan cannot be sensibly addressed. We can, however, recast biogeographical questions in terms of the distribution of genes and their alleles.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialRecombination, GeneticWater MicrobiologyBase SequenceGenetic SpeciationGenomicsGenotypeLikelihood FunctionsMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhenotypePhylogenySequence AlignmentSpecies SpecificityThermotoga maritimaThermotoga neapolitana

Identifiers

PMID16322518
PMCPMC1456242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.