ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2005
Strategies to investigate gene expression and function in granule cells.
Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Matrix-binding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoforms guide granule cell migration in the cerebellum via VEGF receptor Flk1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010Article
- Melatonin decreases the oxidative stress produced by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rat cerebellar granule cells.Neurotoxicity research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying gene expression in granule cells is a major route to understanding the factors required for many key cellular processes such as specification, proliferation, migration, differentiation, apoptosis, tumour formation and neurodegeneration. A greater understanding of these processes will not only provide insight into cerebellum development, but also diseases of the cerebellum. Granule cells can be readily grown in culture and both viral and non-viral strategies have been optimised to allow gene transfer and expression in cultured cells. However, granule cell migration and maturation are inherent parts of cerebellum development and these rely on interactions with other cells. Hence, a true picture of gene function in these cells can only be obtained when tissue context is maintained. Studies of gene function in this context can be achieved by creation of mouse models. Conditional mouse models, where loss of gene expression is restricted as far as possible to granule cells, are by far the most informative resource in this respect. Despite their obvious benefits, the production of mouse models is both costly and time-consuming and this may be further compounded by a potential lack of phenotype due to redundancy of gene function. Organotypic slice cultures, on the other hand, are a comparatively cheap and accessible model for studies of gene function where tissue context is maintained. Recent technologies have provided the means to manipulate gene expression in such systems and are beginning to yield valuable insights into the molecular regulation of cerebellum development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.