Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2006
Haemodynamic effects of AT1 inhibition and Ca2+-channel blockade in hypertensive patients during isometric stress.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on the haemodynamics of forearm circulation in hypertensive patients undergoing isometric stress. A total of 24 patients with essential hypertension were subjected to a double blind-cross-over study. The artery left arm flow (strain gauge plethysmography), distensibility of digital arteries (piezoelectric plethysmography) and blood pressure were measured. District resistance was calculated as the ratio between mean arterial pressure and blood flow. The tests were performed at basal conditions (T0) and after 8 days (T8) of therapy with valsartan (160 mg) or amlodipine (10 mg), at rest and during handgrip (HG); treatments were inverted after 15 days of washout. Valsartan and amlodipine reduced blood pressure after 8 days (P<0.05), handgrip increased systolic and diastolic values and heart rate at T0 and only a slight raising in diastolic values at T8. The recovery time of pressure values was longer in hypertensives treated with amlodipine (P<0.05). The forearm flow increased after HG (at T0 an T8) and increased even further after valsartan (P<0.005). Valsartan increased arteriolar distensibility, expressed by the ratio between time to peak and total time (PT/TT) calculated on the sphygmic wave. Amlodipine did not affect PT/TT ratio, whereas it reduced local resistance (T8 vs T0, P<0.05). The reduction effect of valsartan on resistance was detectable also during handgrip, on the contrary amlodipine did not control the increase. Inhibition of AT1 is able to reduce haemodynamic modifications elicited by isometric stress in hypertensive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.