ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2005
Anaplasma phagocytophilum-infected ticks, Japan.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The bacterial diversity and potential pathogenic risks of giant panda-infesting ticks.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Nationwide Geographical and Temporal Distribution of Tick-Borne Diseases in Korean Water Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in North India.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Perspectives of vector management in the control and elimination of vector-borne zoonoses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- The detection and phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like 1, A. ovis and A. capra in sheep: A. capra divides into two genogroups.Veterinary research communications · 2022Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogeny of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Dogs in the Republic of Korea.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogeny ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- First identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in both a biting tick Ixodes nipponensis and a patient in Korea: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- An efficient microinjection method to generate human anaplasmosis agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum-infected ticks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Molecular prevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2019Article
- Article
- Review
- Microtomography of the Baltic amber tick Ixodes succineus reveals affinities with the modern Asian disease vector Ixodes ovatus.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Molecular Survey of Anaplasma Species in Small Ruminants Reveals the Presence of Novel Strains Closely Related to A. phagocytophilum in Tunisia.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2015Article
- Anaplasma phagocytophilum antibodies in humans, Japan, 2010-2011.Emerging infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Human granulocytic Anaplasmosis, Japan.Emerging infectious diseases · 2013Article
- Molecular analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum isolated from patients with febrile diseases of unknown etiology in China.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection of Ixodes persulcatus and I. ovatus ticks in Japan. Unique p44/msp2 paralogs (and/or 16S rRNA genes) were detected in tick tissues, salivary glands, and spleens of experimentally infected mice. These findings indicate the public health threat of anaplasmosis in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.