Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16318421›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2005

Potential of mesenchymal stem cells in gene therapy approaches for inherited and acquired diseases.

Jakob Reiser, Xian-Yang Zhang, Charles S Hemenway, Debasis Mondal, Leena Pradhan, Vincent F La Russa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Designing molecules: directing stem cell differentiation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jakob ReiserLSU Health Sciences Center, Gene Therapy Program, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Xian-Yang Zhang
Charles S Hemenway
Debasis Mondal
Leena Pradhan
Vincent F La Russa

Funding

Delivery of Therapeutic Enzymes and Genes to the CNSR01NS044832 · NINDS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI ZHANG, XIAN-YANG · 2003 to 2006
$913k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044832NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044832-02NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044832-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intriguing biology of stem cells and their vast clinical potential is emerging rapidly for gene therapy. Bone marrow stem cells, including the pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and possibly the multipotent adherent progenitor cells (MAPCs), are being considered as potential targets for cell and gene therapy-based approaches against a variety of different diseases. The MSCs from bone marrow are a promising target population as they are capable of differentiating along multiple lineages and, at least in vitro, have significant expansion capability. The apparently high self-renewal potential makes them strong candidates for delivering genes and restoring organ systems function. However, the high proliferative potential of MSCs, now presumed to be self-renewal, may be more apparent than real. Although expanded MSCs have great proliferation and differentiation potential in vitro, there are limitations with the biology of these cells in vivo. So far, expanded MSCs have failed to induce durable therapeutic effects expected from a true self-renewing stem cell population. The loss of in vivo self-renewal may be due to the extensive expansion of MSCs in existing in vitro expansion systems, suggesting that the original stem cell population and/or properties may no longer exist. Rather, the expanded population may indeed be heterogeneous and represents several generations of different types of mesenchymal cell progeny that have retained a limited proliferation potential and responsiveness for terminal differentiation and maturation along mesenchymal and non-mesenchymal lineages. Novel technology that allows MSCs to maintain their stem cell function in vivo is critical for distinguishing the elusive stem cell from its progenitor cell populations. The ultimate dream is to use MSCs in various forms of cellular therapies, as well as genetic tools that can be used to better understand the mechanisms leading to repair and regeneration of damaged or diseased tissues and organs.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TherapyHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID16318421
PMCPMC1371057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.