Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16317534›Full record

Trial reportUrological research2005

The use of tamsulosin in the medical treatment of ureteral calculi: where do we stand?

Riccardo Autorino, Marco De Sio, Rocco Damiano, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Sisto Perdonà, Aniello Russo, Giuseppe Quarto, Luca Cosentino, Massimo D'Armiento

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urological research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00451061 (The Efficacy of Alpha-blockers for Expulsion of Distal Ureteral Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00451061 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Alpha-blockers for Expulsion of Distal Ureteral Stones

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoroka University Medical CenterRan2007Enrolled120ConditionsRenal ColicArmsAlfuzosin, Tamsulosin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Emergency management of ureteral stones: Recent advances.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2008
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo AutorinoDepartment of Urology, Second University, Naples, Italy. ricautor@tin.it
Marco De Sio
Rocco Damiano
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
Sisto Perdonà
Aniello Russo
Giuseppe Quarto
Luca Cosentino
Massimo D'Armiento
Institute of Protein Biochemistry · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that specific adrenoceptors subtypes (alpha(1A)/alpha(1D)) are prevalent in the distal part of the ureter, a finding supporting the interesting results obtained by different groups with the use of tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. We performed a prospective randomized study to evaluate the effects of the addition of tamsulosin on our standard pharmacological therapy for the treatment of selected ureteral stones. A total of 64 patients referred to our department for the management of symptomatic ureteral calculi were considered. Patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: group A (n=32) who received diclofenac (100 mg/daily) plus aescin (80 mg/daily) and group B (n=32) who received the same therapy plus tamsulosin (0.4 mg/daily) for a maximum of 2 weeks. No significant differences were found between the groups for age, gender distribution and mean stone size measured in the single largest dimension at presentation. The stone expulsion rate was 60% (19/32 patients) for group A and 88% for (28/32) for group B with a mean expulsion time of 7.4+/-2.2 (range 3.5-12) and 4.8+/-2.7 days (range 1.8-10.5), respectively. Group B showed a significant advantage in terms of both expulsion rate (P=0.01) and expulsion time (P=0.005). Different analgesics from those used in the standard treatment regimen were required in ten patients in group A (31%) but only three patients in group B (9%). This difference was significant (P=0.003). Hospitalization for recurrent colic was needed in 21% of patients in group A (7/32) and in 9% in group B (3/32) (P=0.01). Only two patients in each group (6%) experienced minor side effects associated with the expulsive therapy. Our data confirm the efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones up to 1 cm. This selective alpha-blocker should therefore be included in the pharmacological regimen of patients when a conservative approach is considered in the treatment of ureteral lithiasis.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacEscinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSulfonamidesTamsulosinUreteral CalculiAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacEscinSulfonamidesTamsulosin

Identifiers

PMID16317534
OpenAlexW1977163919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.