Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16316463›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2005

Efficient single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in laboratory rat strains using wild rat-derived SNP candidates.

Bart M G Smits, Victor Guryev, Dimphy Zeegers, Dirk Wedekind, Hans J Hedrich, Edwin Cuppen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A target-selected Apc-mutant rat kindred enhances the modeling of familial human colon cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bart M G SmitsHubrecht Laboratory, Functional Genomics Group, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands. smits@niob.knaw.nl
Victor Guryev
Dimphy Zeegers
Dirk Wedekind
Hans J Hedrich
Edwin Cuppen
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) is an important model for studying many aspects of human health and disease. Detailed knowledge on genetic variation between strains is important from a biomedical, particularly pharmacogenetic point of view and useful for marker selection for genetic cloning and association studies.

resultsWe show that Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in commonly used rat strains are surprisingly well represented in wild rat isolates. Shotgun sequencing of 814 Kbp in one wild rat resulted in the identification of 485 SNPs as compared with the Brown Norway genome sequence. Genotyping 36 commonly used inbred rat strains showed that 84% of these alleles are also polymorphic in a representative set of laboratory rat strains.

conclusionWe postulate that shotgun sequencing in a wild rat sample and subsequent genotyping in multiple laboratory or domesticated strains rather than direct shotgun sequencing of multiple strains, could be the most efficient SNP discovery approach. For the rat, laboratory strains still harbor a large portion of the haplotypes present in wild isolates, suggesting a relatively recent common origin and supporting the idea that rat inbred strains, in contrast to mouse inbred strains, originate from a single species, R. norvegicus.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsAutomationDNAGene LibraryGenomeGenotypeHaplotypesMicePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticRatsSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA

Identifiers

PMID16316463
PMCPMC1318490
OpenAlexW2155619341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.