Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16316334›Full record

ArticleKidney international2005

Prediction of urinary protein markers in lupus nephritis.

Jim C Oates, Sanju Varghese, Alison M Bland, Timothy P Taylor, Sally E Self, Romesh Stanislaus, Jonas S Almeida, John M Arthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of Biomarker Models to Predict Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis: is it still relevant?Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Urinary biomarkers in lupus nephritis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2011
    Review
  18. Biomarkers for lupus nephritis: a critical appraisal.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010
    Review
  19. Deconvoluting the 'omics' for organ transplantation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jim C OatesDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina and Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. arthurj@musc.edu
Sanju Varghese
Alison M Bland
Timothy P Taylor
Sally E Self
Romesh Stanislaus
Jonas S Almeida
John M Arthur

Funding

ZINC AND COPPER METABOLISM IN COLLAGEN DISORDERSM01RR001070 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI REVES, JOSEPH G · 1985 to 2009
$16.3M
Urine protein markers of disease in lupus nephritisR21AR051719 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OATES, JAMES C · 2004 to 2005
$126k
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28181N01HV028181 · HV · MEDICAL UNIV OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KNAPP, DANIEL · 2002 to 2006
–
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001070NCRR NIH HHS RR01070NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028181NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-28181NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR051719NIAMS NIH HHS R21AR051719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLupus nephritis is divided into six classes and scored according to activity and chronicity indices based on histologic findings. Treatment differs based on the pathologic findings. Renal biopsy is currently the only way to accurately predict class and activity and chronicity indices. We propose to use patterns of abundance of urine proteins to identify class and disease indices.

methodsUrine was collected from 20 consecutive patients immediately prior to biopsy for evaluation of lupus nephritis. The International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) class of lupus nephritis, activity, and chronicity indices were determined by a renal pathologist. Proteins were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Artificial neural networks were trained on normalized spot abundance values.

resultsBiopsy specimens were classified in the database according to ISN/RPS class, activity, and chronicity. Nine samples had characteristics of more than one class present. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the trained networks demonstrated areas under the curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.95. The sensitivity and specificity for the ISN/RPS classes were class II 100%, 100%; III 86%, 100%; IV 100%, 92%; and V 92%, 50%. Activity and chronicity indices had r values of 0.77 and 0.87, respectively. A list of spots was obtained that provided diagnostic sensitivity to the analysis.

conclusionWe have identified a list of protein spots that can be used to develop a clinical assay to predict ISN/RPS class and chronicity for patients with lupus nephritis. An assay based on antibodies against these spots could eliminate the need for renal biopsy, allow frequent evaluation of disease status, and begin specific therapy for patients with lupus nephritis.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalHumansLupus NephritisNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsProteinuriaBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID16316334
PMCPMC2667626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.