Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16315063›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2006

Phylogenetic relationship of the populations within and around Japan using 105 short tandem repeat polymorphic loci.

Shi-Lin Li, Toshimichi Yamamoto, Takashi Yoshimoto, Rieko Uchihi, Masaki Mizutani, Yukihide Kurimoto, Katsushi Tokunaga, Feng Jin, Yoshinao Katsumata, Naruya Saitou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shi-Lin LiDepartment of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. yamachan@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Toshimichi Yamamoto
Takashi Yoshimoto
Rieko Uchihi
Masaki Mizutani
Yukihide Kurimoto
Katsushi Tokunaga
Feng Jin
Yoshinao Katsumata
Naruya Saitou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have analyzed 105 autosomal polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) loci for nine East and South-eastern Asian populations (two Japanese, five Han Chinese, Thai, and Burmese populations) and a Caucasian population using a multiplex PCR typing system. All the STR loci are genomewide tetranucleotide repeat markers of which the total number of observed alleles and the observed heterozygosity were 756 and 0.743, respectively, for Japanese populations. Phylogenetic analysis for these allele frequency data suggested that the Japanese populations are more closely related with southern Chinese populations than central and/or northern ones. STRUCTURE program analysis revealed the almost clearly divided and accountable population structure at K=2-6, that the two Japanese populations always formed one group separated from the other populations and never belong to different groups at K> or =3. Furthermore, our new allele frequency data for 91 loci were analyzed with those for 52 worldwide populations published by previous studies. Phylogenetic and multidimensional scaling (MDS) analyses indicated that Asian populations with large population size (six Han Chinese, three Japanese, two Southeast Asia) formed one distinct cluster and are closer to each other than other ethnic minorities in east and Southeast Asia. This pattern may be the caviar of comparing populations with greatly differing population sizes when STR loci were analyzed.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticTandem Repeat SequencesAsia, EasternAsian PeopleAsia, SoutheasternHumansJapanWhite People

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.