Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16314307›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level.

Mehrnaz Fatemi, Martha M Pao, Shinwu Jeong, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Gerda Egger, Daniel J Weisenberger, Peter A Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Profiling Genome-Wide Methylation Patterns in Cattle Infected withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epigenetic Landscapes of Pain: DNA Methylation Dynamics in Chronic Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehrnaz FatemiDepartment of Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-9181, USA.
Martha M Pao
Shinwu Jeong
Einav Nili Gal-Yam
Gerda Egger
Daniel J Weisenberger
Peter A Jones
University of Southern California · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF DE NOVO METHYLATION IN CANCERR01CA082422 · NCI · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JONES, PETER A · 1999 to 2016
$5.1M
DE NOVO DNA METHYLATION IN BLADDER CANCERR01CA083867 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JONES, PETER A, LIANG, GANGNING · 2000 to 2014
$4.7M
Mechanisms of De Novo Methylation in CancerR37CA082422 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JONES, PETER A · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA 82422NCI NIH HHS CA 83867NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082422NCI NIH HHS R01 CA083867NCI NIH HHS R37 CA082422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoters are molecular 'modules', which are controlled as individual entities yet are often analyzed by nuclease digestion methodologies which, a priori, destroy this modularity. About 40% of mammalian genes contain CpG islands in their promoters and exonic regions, which are normally unmethylated. We developed a footprinting strategy to map the chromatin structure at unmethylated CpG islands by treatment of isolated nuclei with the CpG-specific DNA methyltransferase SssI (M.SssI), followed by genomic bisulfite sequencing of individual progeny DNA molecules. This gave single molecule resolution over the promoter region and allowed for the physical linkage between binding sites on individual promoter molecules to be maintained. Comparison of the p16 promoters in two human cell lines, J82 and LD419, expressing the p16 gene at 25-fold different levels showed that the two cell lines contain remarkably different, heterogeneously positioned nucleosomes over the promoter region, which were not distinguishable by standard methods using nucleases. Our high resolution approach gives a 'digitized' visualization of each promoter providing information regarding nucleosome occupancy and may be utilized to define transcription factor binding and chromatin remodeling.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsPromoter Regions, GeneticBase SequenceCell LineChromatinDNADNA-Cytosine MethylasesDNA FootprintingDNA MethylationGenes, p16HumansMolecular Sequence DataNucleosomesTranscription Initiation SiteChromatinDNADNA-Cytosine MethylasesDNA modification methylase SssINucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID16314307
PMCPMC1292996
OpenAlexW2098501428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.