Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16307365›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2005

Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags of conifers and angiosperms reveals sequences specifically conserved in conifers.

Tokuko Ujino-Ihara, Hiroyuki Kanamori, Hiroko Yamane, Yuriko Taguchi, Nobukazu Namiki, Yuzuru Mukai, Kensuke Yoshimura, Yoshihiko Tsumura

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A protocol forPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020
    Article
  2. DNA methylome of the 20-gigabase Norway spruce genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tokuko Ujino-IharaGenome Analysis Laboratory, Department of Forest Genetics, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, 305-8687, Ibaraki, Japan. udino@ affrc.go.jp
Hiroyuki Kanamori
Hiroko Yamane
Yuriko Taguchi
Nobukazu Namiki
Yuzuru Mukai
Kensuke Yoshimura
Yoshihiko Tsumura
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute · JPGifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify and characterize lineage-specific genes of conifers, two sets of ESTs (with 12791 and 5902 ESTs, representing 5373 and 3018 gene transcripts, respectively) were generated from the Cupressaceae species Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa. These transcripts were compared with non-redundant sets of genes generated from Pinaceae species, other gymnosperms and angiosperms. About 6% of tentative unique genes (Unigenes) of C. japonica and C. obtusa had homologs in other conifers but not angiosperms, and about 70% had apparent homologs in angiosperms. The calculated GC contents of orthologous genes showed that GC contents of coniferous genes are likely to be lower than those of angiosperms. Comparisons of the numbers of homologous genes in each species suggest that copy numbers of genes may be correlated between diverse seed plants. This correlation suggests that the multiplicity of such genes may have arisen before the divergence of gymnosperms and angiosperms.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantBase SequenceChamaecyparisComputational BiologyConserved SequenceCryptomeriaDNA, ComplementaryEvolution, MolecularGene LibraryGenome, PlantMagnoliopsidaMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPhylogenyDNA, ComplementaryPeptidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID16307365
OpenAlexW2095153597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.