Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16307361›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2005

The genomic organization of retrotransposons in Brassica oleracea.

Karine Alix, Carol D Ryder, Jay Moore, Graham J King, J S Pat Heslop-Harrison

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Size and location of radish chromosome regions carrying the fertility restorer Rfk1 gene in spring turnip rape.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FIDEL-a retrovirus-like retrotransposon and its distinct evolutionary histories in the A- and B-genome components of cultivated peanut.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2010
    Article
  11. Repetitive sequence-derived markers tag centromeres and telomeres and provide insights into chromosome evolution in Brassica napus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cytogenetics and genome analysis in Brassica crops.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Mobilization and evolutionary history of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in Beta vulgaris L.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karine AlixDepartment of Biology, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK.
Carol D Ryder
Jay Moore
Graham J King
J S Pat Heslop-Harrison

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated the copy numbers and genomic organization of five representative reverse transcriptase domains from retrotransposons in Brassica oleracea. Two non-homologous Pseudoviridae (Ty1/copia-like) elements, two Metaviridae (Ty3/gypsy-like) elements (one related to the Athila family) and one Retroposinae (LINE) element were hybridized to a gridded BAC library, "BoB". The results indicated that the individual LTR retrotransposons (copia and gypsy-like) were represented by between 90 and 320 copies in the haploid genome, with only evidence of a single location for the LINE. Sequence analysis of the same elements against genome survey sequence gave estimates of between 60 and 570, but no LINE was found. There was minimal evidence for clustering between any of these retroelements: only half the randomly expected number of BACs hybridized to both LTR-retrotransposon families. Fluorescent in situ hybridization showed that each of the retroelements had a characteristic genomic distribution. Our results suggest there are preferential sites and perhaps control mechanisms for the insertion or excision of different retrotransposon groups.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantArabidopsisBlotting, SouthernBrassicaChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsGene LibraryIn Situ HybridizationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMicroscopy, FluorescenceNucleic Acid HybridizationRetroelementsRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelementsRNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.