Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16306583›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Chimeric recombinant human metapneumoviruses with the nucleoprotein or phosphoprotein open reading frame replaced by that of avian metapneumovirus exhibit improved growth in vitro and attenuation in vivo.

Quynh N Pham, Stéphane Biacchesi, Mario H Skiadopoulos, Brian R Murphy, Peter L Collins, Ursula J Buchholz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of a Live Attenuated Human Metapneumovirus Vaccine in Adults and Children.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Negative-Strand RNA Virus-Vectored Vaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent vaccine development for human metapneumovirus.The Journal of general virology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quynh N PhamLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892-8007, USA.
Stéphane Biacchesi
Mario H Skiadopoulos
Brian R Murphy
Peter L Collins
Ursula J Buchholz
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE GENOME OF RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUSZ01AI000368 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI COLLINS, PETER LEON · 1985 to 2008
$1.7M
Metapneumovirus Biology and Vaccine DevelopmentZIAAI000368 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI COLLINS, PETER LEON · 2009 to 2010
$976k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric versions of recombinant human metapneumovirus (HMPV) were generated by replacing the nucleoprotein (N) or phosphoprotein (P) open reading frame with its counterpart from the closely related avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) subgroup C. In Vero cells, AMPV replicated to an approximately 100-fold-higher titer than HMPV. Surprisingly, the N and P chimeric viruses replicated to a peak titer that was 11- and 25-fold higher, respectively, than that of parental HMPV. The basis for this effect is not known but was not due to obvious changes in the efficiency of gene expression. AMPV and the N and P chimeras were evaluated for replication, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy in hamsters. AMPV was attenuated compared to HMPV in this mammalian host on day 5 postinfection, but not on day 3, and only in the nasal turbinates. In contrast, the N and P chimeras were reduced approximately 100-fold in both the upper and lower respiratory tract on day 3 postinfection, although there was little difference by day 5. The N and P chimeras induced a high level of neutralizing serum antibodies and protective efficacy against HMPV; AMPV was only weakly immunogenic and protective against HMPV challenge, reflecting antigenic differences. In African green monkeys immunized intranasally and intratracheally, the mean peak titer of the P chimera was reduced 100- and 1,000-fold in the upper and lower respiratory tracts, whereas the N chimera was reduced only 10-fold in the lower respiratory tract. Both chimeras were comparable to wild-type HMPV in immunogenicity and protective efficacy. Thus, the P chimera is a promising live HMPV vaccine candidate that paradoxically combines improved growth in vitro with attenuation in vivo.

Indexed as

Genes, ViralRecombination, GeneticAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCricetinaeGene DeletionHumansMetapneumovirusNucleoproteinsOpen Reading FramesPhosphoproteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVero CellsViral VaccinesVirulenceVirus ReplicationNucleoproteinsPhosphoproteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16306583
PMCPMC1316028
OpenAlexW2166982260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.