Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16306507›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2005

Effect of swimming intensity on subsequent cycling and overall triathlon performance.

P D Peeling, D J Bishop, G J Landers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of the Hydrodynamic Profile Between Competitive Triathletes and Swimmers.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors influencing pacing in triathlon.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Swim Positioning and its Influence on Triathlon Outcome.International journal of exercise science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P D PeelingUniversity of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. peelip01@student.uwa.edu.au
D J Bishop
G J Landers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effects of different swimming intensities on subsequent cycling and overall triathlon performance.

methodsNine highly trained, male triathletes completed five separate laboratory sessions comprising one graded exercise test, a swim time trial (STT), and three sprint distance triathlons (TRI). The swimming velocities of the three TRI sessions were 80-85% (S80), 90-95% (S90), and 98-102% (S100) of the STT velocity. Subsequent cycling and running were performed at a perceived maximal intensity. Swimming stroke mechanics were measured during the swim. Plasma lactate concentration and ratings of perceived exertion were recorded at the conclusion of the swim and over the course of subsequent cycling and running. Oxygen consumption was recorded during the cycle.

resultsThe S80 and S90 cycle times were faster than the S100 cycle time (p<0.05). The overall triathlon time of S80 was faster than that of S100 (p<0.05). The S100 swim was characterised by a greater stroke rate than S80 and S90 (p<0.05) and a greater plasma lactate concentration than S80 (p<0.01).

conclusionA swimming intensity below that of a time trial effort significantly improves subsequent cycling and overall triathlon performance.

Indexed as

AdultBicyclingExercise TestHumansLactic AcidMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EnduranceRunningSwimmingTask Performance and AnalysisLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID16306507
PMCPMC1725096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.