Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16306233›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

In vivo selection of engineered homing endonucleases using double-strand break induced homologous recombination.

Patrick Chames, Jean-Charles Epinat, Sophie Guillier, Amélie Patin, Emmanuel Lacroix, Frédéric Pâques

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gene Editing in Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In Vivo Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Homing endonucleases: from genetic anomalies to programmable genomic clippers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Precision editing of large animal genomes.Advances in genetics · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Homing endonucleases: from basics to therapeutic applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick ChamesCELLECTIS S.A., 102 route de Noisy 93235, Romainville, France.
Jean-Charles Epinat
Sophie Guillier
Amélie Patin
Emmanuel Lacroix
Frédéric Pâques
Egis (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homing endonucleases, endonucleases capable of recognizing long DNA sequences, have been shown to be a tool of choice for precise and efficient genome engineering. Consequently, the possibility to engineer novel endonucleases with tailored specificities is under strong investigation. In this report, we present a simple and efficient method to select meganucleases from libraries of variants, based on their cleavage properties. The method has the advantage of directly selecting for the ability to induce double-strand break induced homologous recombination in a eukaryotic environment. Model selections demonstrated high levels of enrichments. Moreover, this method compared favorably with phage display for enrichment of active mutants from a mutant library. This approach makes possible the exploration of large sequence spaces and thereby represents a valuable tool for genome engineering.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBinding SitesDNADNA Restriction EnzymesGene LibraryGenomicsMutationPeptide LibraryPlasmidsProtein EngineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNADNA Restriction Enzymesendodeoxyribonuclease CreIPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID16306233
PMCPMC1289081
OpenAlexW2014277911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.