Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16304186›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

In vitro activity of ravuconazole against 923 clinical isolates of nondermatophyte filamentous fungi.

Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Alicia Gomez-Lopez, Emilia Mellado, Guillermo Garcia-Effron, Araceli Monzon, Juan Luis Rodriguez-Tudela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Rare Case ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  6. Infection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Madurella mycetomatis is highly susceptible to ravuconazole.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014
    Article
  13. Melanized fungi in human disease.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Infections caused by Scedosporium spp.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2008
    Review
  17. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2007
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuel Cuenca-EstrellaServicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ctra Majadahonda-Pozuelo Km 2, 28220 Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain. mcuenca-estrella@isciii.es
Alicia Gomez-Lopez
Emilia Mellado
Guillermo Garcia-Effron
Araceli Monzon
Juan Luis Rodriguez-Tudela

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro activities of ravuconazole against 575 clinical strains of Aspergillus spp. and 348 nondermatophyte non-Aspergillus spp. were analyzed. Ravuconazole was active against Aspergillus spp., other hyaline filamentous fungi, black molds, and some Mucorales. Species such as Scedosporium prolificans, Fusarium spp., and Scopulariopsis spp. were resistant to the triazole.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsFungiHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsThiazolesTriazolesAntifungal AgentsER 30346ThiazolesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID16304186
PMCPMC1315962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.