Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16304147›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Comparative efficacies of conventional amphotericin b, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome), caspofungin, micafungin, and voriconazole alone and in combination against experimental murine central nervous system aspergillosis.

Karl V Clemons, Marife Espiritu, Rachana Parmar, David A Stevens

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  14. Preclinical Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Antifungal Activity of Liposomal Amphotericin B.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animal Models of Aspergillosis.Comparative medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  19. Rodent Models of Invasive Aspergillosis due toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karl V ClemonsCalifornia Institute for Medical Research, Division of Infectious Diseases, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 751 South Bascom Ave., San Jose, California 95128-2699, USA. clemons@cimr.org
Marife Espiritu
Rachana Parmar
David A Stevens
California Institute for Medical Research · USSanta Clara Valley Medical Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) aspergillosis is a severe disease that responds poorly to current therapies. The current studies examined the efficacies of several antifungal agents alone or in combination with a murine model of CNS aspergillosis. Immunosuppressed mice were infected intracerebrally with Aspergillus fumigatus and treated with an amphotericin B preparation, an echinocandin, or voriconazole (VCZ) given alone or in combination. Monotherapy studies showed that micafungin (MICA), caspofungin (CAS), VCZ, conventional amphotericin B (AMB), Abelcet (ABLC) (a lipid-carried AMB formulation; Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), and AmBisome (AmBi) (liposomal AMB; Gilead Sciences, Inc.) were efficacious. However, doses of AmBi above 15 mg/kg of body weight showed reduced efficacy. Neither MICA nor CAS showed dose responsiveness at the doses tested (1, 5, or 10 mg/kg). Only the 40-mg/kg dose of VCZ was effective. AmBi and ABLC showed dose responsiveness, with 10-mg/kg doses causing a significant reduction in fungal burden; they had equivalent activities at the 10-mg/kg dose. Suboptimal dosages of AmBi in combination with MICA, CAS, or VCZ were effective in prolonging survival. However, significantly enhanced activity was demonstrated only with AmBi and VCZ in combination. AmBi in combination with MICA or CAS showed a trend toward enhanced activity, but the combination was not significantly superior to monotherapy. The use of AmBi with CAS or VCZ at optimal doses did not improve efficacy. Cure was not attained with any dosage combinations. These results indicate that AmBi in combination with VCZ may be superior for treatment of CNS aspergillosis; combinations of AmBi and MICA or CAS were not antagonistic and may have a slight benefit.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisCaspofunginCentral Nervous System Fungal InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationEchinocandinsLipopeptidesLipoproteinsLiposomesMicafunginMicePeptides, CyclicAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginDrug CombinationsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesLipoproteinsLiposomesMicafunginPeptides, CyclicPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID16304147
PMCPMC1315954
OpenAlexW2054771967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.