Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16303567›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2005

A large-scale screen in S. pombe identifies seven novel genes required for critical meiotic events.

Cristina Martín-Castellanos, Miguel Blanco, Ana E Rozalén, Livia Pérez-Hidalgo, Ana I García, Francisco Conde, Juan Mata, Chad Ellermeier, Luther Davis, Pedro San-Segundo and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antifungal activity and mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. A meiotic driver hijacks an epigenetic reader to disrupt mitosis in noncarrier offspring.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Membrane and organelle rearrangement during ascospore formation in budding yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina Martín-CastellanosInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC/Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Miguel Blanco
Ana E Rozalén
Livia Pérez-Hidalgo
Ana I García
Francisco Conde
Juan Mata
Chad Ellermeier
Luther Davis
Pedro San-Segundo
Gerald R Smith
Sergio Moreno
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAUniversidad de Salamanca · ESWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF GENETIC RECOMBINATIONR01GM032194 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SMITH, GERALD R · 1985 to 2016
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32194NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division by which sexually reproducing diploid organisms generate haploid gametes. During a long prophase, telomeres cluster into the bouquet configuration to aid chromosome pairing, and DNA replication is followed by high levels of recombination between homologous chromosomes (homologs). This recombination is important for the reductional segregation of homologs at the first meiotic division; without further replication, a second meiotic division yields haploid nuclei. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we have deleted 175 meiotically upregulated genes and found seven genes not previously reported to be critical for meiotic events. Three mutants (rec24, rec25, and rec27) had strongly reduced meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breakage and recombination. One mutant (tht2) was deficient in karyogamy, and two (bqt1 and bqt2) were deficient in telomere clustering, explaining their defects in recombination and segregation. The moa1 mutant was delayed in premeiotic S phase progression and nuclear divisions. Further analysis of these mutants will help elucidate the complex machinery governing the special behavior of meiotic chromosomes.

Indexed as

Genes, cdcChromosome SegregationGene DeletionGenes, FungalMeiosisMutationRecombination, GeneticSchizosaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID16303567
PMCPMC2721798
OpenAlexW1991145780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.