ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2005
Urinary protein analysis in pre- and postoperative cancer patients.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deconvoluting the 'omics' for organ transplantation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2009Review
- The proteogenomic path towards biomarker discovery.Pediatric transplantation · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary proteins from six patients with esophageal cancer and two with stomach cancer were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Analyses were performed on days-1 to 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 (or 22) after surgery. The protein patterns were scanned by densitometry and divided into nine fractions. The main proteins in the fractions (Fr.) were identified as follows: immunoglobulin G in Fr. A, Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (THP) in Fr. B, transferrin in Fr. C, albumin in Fr. D, alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein in Fr. E, alpha(1)-microglobulin in Fr. F, retinol binding protein in Fr. G, and beta(2)-microglobulin in Fr. I. The protein in Fr. H was not identified. The percentage of each fraction was calculated from the densitometry pattern of each lane. The percentage values were averaged among all the patients, and pre- and postoperative data were compared. The percentage of Frs. E, F, and G increased on days 1-7, and the changes in these three proteins were similar to changes in serum C-reactive protein (CRP). In particular, the percentage of Fr. G peaked within 1 day of operation, which was faster than for CRP. Conversely, other fractions decreased. These results suggest that urinary protein analysis is useful for monitoring the response to surgical stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.