ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2005
Clinical practice guidelines and conflict of interest.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: associations with recommendations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Canadian Association of Gastroenterology policy on the application for, and implementation of, clinical practice guidelines.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2014Guideline
- AGREEing on Canadian cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Review
- Competing interests in development of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes management: Report from a multidisciplinary workshop.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2008Article
- Moving from opacity to transparency in pharmaceutical policy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Review
- Public involvement in guideline development.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2007Article
- Clinical practice guidelines and industry.Mens sana monographs · 2007Article
- Guideline standardisation, cost effectiveness, industry needs and conflict of interest.Mens sana monographs · 2007Article
- Evidence and advocacy: are all things considered?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
- The Canadian Hypertension Education Program--a unique Canadian initiative.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Article
- Not all guidelines are created equal.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
- Not all guidelines are created equal.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
- Assessing and scaling the knowledge pyramid: the good-guideline guide.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
- The Canadian Diabetes Association guidelines: putting the evidence first.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.