Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16297242›Full record

ReviewMolecular pain2005

Feed-forward inhibition: a novel cellular mechanism for the analgesic effect of substance P.

Long-Jun Wu, Hui Xu, Shanelle W Ko, Megumu Yoshimura, Min Zhuo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pain, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03531541 (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cervical Joint Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03531541 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cervical Joint Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2018 to 2019Enrolled144ConditionsPainArmsApplication of TENS, CJM, Placebo TENS, Placebo CJM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AAV-Mediated Combination Gene Therapy for Neuropathic Pain: GAD65, GDNF, and IL-10.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Long-Jun WuDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain, Medical Science Building, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. longjun.wu@utoronto.ca
Hui Xu
Shanelle W Ko
Megumu Yoshimura
Min Zhuo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance P (SP) is a neuropeptide well known for its contribution to pain transmission in the spinal cord, however, less is known about the possible modulatory effects of SP. A new study by Gu and colleagues, published in Molecular Pain (2005, 1:20), describes its potential role in feed-forward inhibition in lamina V of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. This inhibition seems to function through a direct excitation of GABAergic interneurons by substance P released from primary afferent fibers and has a distinct temporal phase of action from the well-described glutamate-dependent feed-forward inhibition. It is believed that through this inhibition, substance P can balance nociceptive output from the spinal cord.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsHumansNeural InhibitionNociceptorsPainPosterior Horn CellsPresynaptic TerminalsReceptors, Neurokinin-1Spinal Nerve RootsSubstance PSynaptic TransmissionReceptors, Neurokinin-1Substance P

Identifiers

PMID16297242
PMCPMC1315348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.