Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16297240›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2005

A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data.

Mehrnoush Khojasteh, Wan L Lam, Rabab K Ward, Calum MacAulay

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reducing system noise in copy number data using principal components of self-self hybridizations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cyclin E1 is amplified and overexpressed in osteosarcoma.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehrnoush KhojastehBritish Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mkhojast@bccrc.ca
Wan L Lam
Rabab K Ward
Calum MacAulay

Funding

Whole genome array CGH of progressing oral dysplasiaR01DE015965 · NIDCR · BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY · PI LAM, WAN L · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn two-channel competitive genomic hybridization microarray experiments, the ratio of the two fluorescent signal intensities at each spot on the microarray is commonly used to infer the relative amounts of the test and reference sample DNA levels. This ratio may be influenced by systematic measurement effects from non-biological sources that can introduce biases in the estimated ratios. These biases should be removed before drawing conclusions about the relative levels of DNA. The performance of existing gene expression microarray normalization strategies has not been evaluated for removing systematic biases encountered in array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), which aims to detect single copy gains and losses typically in samples with heterogeneous cell populations resulting in only slight shifts in signal ratios. The purpose of this work is to establish a framework for correcting the systematic sources of variation in high density CGH array images, while maintaining the true biological variations.

resultsAfter an investigation of the systematic variations in the data from two array CGH platforms, SMRT (Sub Mega base Resolution Tiling) BAC arrays and cDNA arrays of Pollack et al., we have developed a stepwise normalization framework integrating novel and existing normalization methods in order to reduce intensity, spatial, plate and background biases. We used stringent measures to quantify the performance of this stepwise normalization using data derived from 5 sets of experiments representing self-self hybridizations, replicated experiments, detection of single copy changes, array CGH experiments which mimic cell population heterogeneity, and array CGH experiments simulating different levels of gene amplifications and deletions. Our results demonstrate that the three-step normalization procedure provides significant improvement in the sensitivity of detection of single copy changes compared to conventional single step normalization approaches in both SMRT BAC array and cDNA array platforms.

conclusionThe proposed stepwise normalization framework preserves the minute copy number changes while removing the observed systematic biases.

Indexed as

CalibrationDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic VariationHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNucleic Acid HybridizationObserver VariationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSex CharacteristicsDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID16297240
PMCPMC1310623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.