Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16296870›Full record

ArticleDrugs2005

Tuberculosis vaccines: current progress.

Ian M Orme

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal models of tuberculosis: Guinea pigs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ian M OrmeMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. ian.orme@colostate.edu

Funding

STRATEGIES FOR TUBERCULOSIS VACCINE DEVELOPMENT AND SCRER01AI045707 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI ORME, IAN M · 2000 to 2004
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-45707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis continues to be a major cause of disease and death throughout the developing world. Chemotherapy is the current method of control but with the continuing emergence of drug resistance, coupled with the reticence of major drug companies to invest in drug discovery, the identification of new vaccines to combat tuberculosis is a pressing need. Rational vaccine design requires knowledge of the protective immune response and, while this is not fully understood, it is clear that induction of a T-helper-1 type of immunity is critical to host resistance. A variety of animal models, but especially the mouse and guinea pig, can be used to determine the protective efficacy of new vaccines. These mostly consist of relatively short-term prophylactic models in which animals are vaccinated and then challenged by the aerosol infection route to determine their capacity to reduce the lung bacterial load. Several promising vaccine types have emerged, including subunit vaccines, DNA vaccines and vaccines based upon living vectors, such as recombinant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccines and auxotrophic or gene disrupted mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A few of these have already entered early stage clinical trials.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis VaccinesAnimalsBCG VaccineClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunity, CellularImmunization, SecondaryMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisVaccinationVaccines, DNAVaccines, SubunitBCG VaccineTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.