Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16295701›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP

A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women.

Tatiana M Bailey, Jorge Delva, Kimberlee Gretebeck, Kristine Siefert, Amid Ismail

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of health promotion : AJHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Community-based participatory approach to reduce breast cancer disparities in south Dallas.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2011
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2009
    Article
  15. Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatiana M BaileySchool of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
Jorge Delva
Kimberlee Gretebeck
Kristine Siefert
Amid Ismail
Institute for Social Research · NO

Funding

STUDY OF A NEW PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR MEDICAIDU54DE014261 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ISMAIL, AMID I. · 2001 to 2007
$9.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5 U54 DE14261 02NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014261NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014261-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing mammography screening among low-income women. DATA SOURCES: Bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ISI Web of Science, were searched for relevant articles. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized, community-based trials targeting low-income women and published between January 1980 and March 2003 were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The search yielded 242 studies; 24 met all inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three studies used mammography vans, three used low-cost vouchers or provided free mammograms, three used home visits, one used community education alone, one provided referrals, five incorporated multiple intervention strategies, two used phone calls, one used videos and print material, and five used primarily print material.

resultsOf nine studies that reduced barriers to care via mammography vans, cost vouchers, or home visits, eight showed statistically significant increases in mammography screening. Seven of the eight studies that used peer educators had significant increases in screening, as did four of the five studies that used multiple (intervention) components.

conclusionsInterventions that used peer educators, incorporated multiple intervention strategies, or provided easy access via vans, cost vouchers, or home visits were effective in increasing screenings. Mailed letter or telephone reminders were not effective in trials involving low-income women, which is contrary to findings from middle/upper-income studies.

Indexed as

Health EducationPovertyFemaleHumansMammography

Identifiers

PMID16295701
PMCPMC1820866
OpenAlexW1983565666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.