Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16292490›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2006

Primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNETs) located in the spinal canal; the relevance of classification as central or peripheral PNET : case report of a primary spinal PNET occurrence with a critical literature review.

W A Kampman, J M Kros, T H R De Jong, M H Lequin

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumour Invading the Inferior Vena Cava.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Primary spinal intramedullary primitive neuroectodermal tumor.Journal of pediatric neurosciences · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

W A KampmanAcademic Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (AZVUB), Brussels, Belgium. kampmanwendy@hotmail.com
J M Kros
T H R De Jong
M H Lequin
Erasmus MC · NLVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraspinal location of central PNET (cPNET) is very rare. We present a case, critically review all publications of primary intraspinal cPNET occurrence and discuss tendencies in clinical presentation. In several previous attempts to summarise, authors often confused cPNET with peripheral PNET (pPNET). cPNET and pPNET are different entities with different immunohistochemical profiles and genetic backgrounds. Clinically, they are both aggressive tumours, but exhibit different characteristics in their local manifestation and metastatic spread. Survival rates are quite similar provided that treatment is applied according to the established protocols. Protocols in cPNET treatment differ from those for pPNET as regards the order of the treatment sub-modalities, specific chemotherapeutic regimen and intensity, radiation dose and its extent and consequently, the side effects. Therefore, failure to distinguish cPNET from pPNET leads to clinical guidance and treatment proposals based on false assumptions, which might effect outcomes. Often, distinguishing between cPNET and pPNET is easy, because they occur in different location. In the case of intraspinal tumour location, however, the differentiation is crucial because both primary cPNET and pPNET can occur intraspinally, even though this is rare. Nowadays, demonstrating the expression of MIC2 glycoprotein by immunocytochemical staining (CD99) showing the specific EWS-FLI1 chimeric gene presence in pPNET, offers an easy way of making a differential diagnosis between cPNET and pPNET.

Indexed as

12E7 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFatal OutcomeHumansMaleNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive, PeripheralOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWSSpinal Cord Neoplasms12E7 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCD99 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesEWS-FLI fusion proteinOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWS

Identifiers

PMID16292490
OpenAlexW1502287899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.