Trial reportJAMA2005
Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 218 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Alirocumab on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis: The Alirocumab for Stopping Atherosclerosis Progression in Saphenous Vein Grafts (ASAP-SVG) Pilot Trial
A Phase III, Multi-Center Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Ex Vivo Treatment With CGT003 of Coronary Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedures
A Nordic, Multicentre, Prospective, Randomized, Register Based, Clinical Trial on No-touch Vein Graft (NT-graft) in Coronary Surgery
Prospective Evaluation for Hybrid Cardiac Procedures
Short-Term Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Upregulation For Vein Graft Disease
Who cites it
218 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 658 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022Pooled it
- The association between coronary graft patency and clinical status in patients with coronary artery disease.European heart journal · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Short-term clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Coronary artery disease · 2015Pooled it
- No-touch vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a registry-based randomized clinical trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- No-touch versus conventional vein in coronary artery bypass grafting: three year follow-up of multicentre randomised PATENCY trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Trial
- Intimal hyperplasia, saphenous vein graft disease, and clinical outcomes: Insights from the CTSN VEST randomized trial.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Trial
- Trial
- The independent reduction in mortality associated with guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2021Trial
- Outcomes following revascularization with radial artery bypass grafts: Insights from the PREVENT-IV trial.American heart journal · 2020Trial
- SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-Centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019Trial
- Long-term performance of an external stent for saphenous vein grafts: the VEST IV trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2018Trial
- Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2018 · on this mapTrial
- Rationale and design of the Drug-Eluting Stents vs Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty (DIVA) Trial.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.The New England journal of medicine · 2016Trial
- Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV.Circulation · 2014Trial
- Vein graft preservation solutions, patency, and outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up from the PREVENT IV randomized clinical trial.JAMA surgery · 2014Trial
- Endoscopic harvesting device type and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.Annals of surgery · 2014Trial
158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextCoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with autologous vein grafting is commonly performed. Progressive neointimal hyperplasia, however, contributes to considerable vein graft failure. Edifoligide is an oligonucleotide decoy that binds to and inhibits E2F transcription factors and thus may prevent neointimal hyperplasia and vein graft failure.
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of pretreating vein grafts with edifoligide for patients undergoing CABG surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3014 patients undergoing primary CABG surgery with at least 2 planned saphenous vein grafts and without concomitant valve surgery, who were enrolled between August 2002 and October 2003 at 107 US sites.
interventionVein grafts were treated ex vivo with either edifoligide or placebo in a pressure-mediated delivery system. The first 2400 patients enrolled were scheduled for 12- to 18-month follow-up angiography.
main outcome measuresThe primary efficacy end point was angiographic vein graft failure (> or =75% vein graft stenosis) occurring 12 to 18 months after CABG surgery. Other end points included other angiographic variables, adverse events through 30 days, and major adverse cardiac events.
resultsA total of 1920 patients (80%) either died (n = 91) or underwent follow-up angiography (n = 1829). Edifoligide had no effect on the primary end point of per patient vein graft failure (436 [45.2%] of 965 patients in the edifoligide group vs 442 [46.3%] of 955 patients in the placebo group; odds ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.80-1.14]; P = .66), on any secondary angiographic end point, or on the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year (101 [6.7%] of 1508 patients in the edifoligide group vs 121 [8.1%] of 1506 patients in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.64-1.08]; P = .16).
conclusionsFailure of at least 1 vein graft is quite common within 12 to 18 months after CABG surgery. Edifoligide is no more effective than placebo in preventing these events. Longer-term follow-up and additional research are needed to determine whether edifoligide has delayed beneficial effects, to understand the mechanisms and clinical consequences of vein graft failure, and to improve the durability of CABG surgery. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00042081.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.