Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16287713›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of experimental medicine2005

The many roads to cross-presentation.

Tom A M Groothuis, Jacques Neefjes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteome profiling of cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions due to dermotropicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeting proteins to distinct subcellular compartments reveals unique requirements for MHC class I and II presentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antigen storage compartments in mature dendritic cells facilitate prolonged cytotoxic T lymphocyte cross-priming capacity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. MHC class I assembly: out and about.Trends in immunology · 2008
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom A M GroothuisDiv. of Tumor Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jacques Neefjes
Cancer Genomics Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-presentation of extracellular antigens by MHC class I molecules is required for priming cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) at locations remote from the site of infection. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain cross-presentation. One such mechanism involves the fusion of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with the endosomal-phagosomal system, in which the machinery required for peptide loading of MHC class I molecules is introduced directly into the phagosome. Here, we discuss the evidence for and against the ER-phagosome concept as well as other possible mechanisms of cross-presentation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCross-PrimingEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansPhagosomesT-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic

Identifiers

PMID16287713
PMCPMC2212981
OpenAlexW2122865615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.