Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16287561›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2005

[Effectiveness of advanced group and individual interventions in tackling tobacco dependency in primary care].

M Ramos Montserrat

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Ripoll-Amengual, Joana [added]; Janer-Llobera, Joana María [added]; Medina-Bombardó, David [added]; Puig-Valls, Bartomeu [added]; Millán-Carmona [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M Ramos MontserratGabinete Técnico, Atención Primaria de Mallorca, Mallorca, España. mramos@ibsalut.caib.es

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of group advanced intervention and individual advanced intervention for smoking management in primary health care; b) to know if in group intervention exists an added positive effect due of the group and, if this is true, to characterize it; and c) to know the advantages and inconvenients that the participants attribute to each intervention.

designControl clinic trial randomized in individual scale.

settingMallorca primary health centers, Spain.

participantsSmokers >5 packet-year or monoxid carbon levels >15 ppm prepared for give up smoking. People younger than 18 years, people with terminal illness, and mental problems will be excluded.

interventionsCandidates will be assigned to: a) group intervention; b) individual intervention; or c) short intervention or control group. Interventions will be done by a nurse and a general practitioner. Depth interview will be done for qualitative study. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENT: Maintained cessation during 12 months confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide measurement. SECONDARY MEASUREMENTS: Self-declared cessation and confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide measurement months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9, and tobacco reduction if there isn't abandonment. ANALYSIS: Intention treatment. Multilevel analysis will be done to determinate the positive effect added of the group if it's proved that exists. Content analysis for qualitative study. DISCUSSION: Randomization will prevent participants will be treated by their general practitioner o their nurse, this can mean worse results than results obtained in practice.

Indexed as

Psychotherapy, GroupSmoking PreventionFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID16287561
PMCPMC7669048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.