Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16287509›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2005

Characterization of lymphocyte populations in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia.

Karina A Keogh, Andrew H Limper

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current perspective on rituximab in rheumatic diseases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karina A KeoghDivision of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. keogh.karina@mayo.edu
Andrew H Limper
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesNonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) has been identified as a distinct entity with a more favorable prognosis and better response to immunosuppressive therapies than usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). However the inflammatory profile of NSIP has not been characterized.

designUsing immunohistochemistry techniques on open lung biopsy specimens, the infiltrate in NSIP was characterized in terms of T and B cells, and macrophages, and the T cell population further identified as either CD4 (helper) or CD8 (suppressor-cytotoxic) T cells. The extent of Th1 and Th2 cytokine producing cells was determined and compared to specimens from patients with UIP.

resultsIn ten NSIP tissue samples 41.4 +/- 4% of mononuclear cells expressed CD3, 24.7 +/- 1.8% CD4, 19.1 +/- 2% CD8, 27.4 +/- 3.9% CD20, and 14.3 +/- 1.6% had CD68 expression. Mononuclear cells expressed INFgamma 21.9 +/- 1.9% of the time and IL-4 in 3.0 +/- 1%. In contrast, biopsies from eight patients with UIP demonstrated substantially less cellular staining for either cytokine (INFgamma; 4.6 +/- 1.7% and IL-4; 0.6 +/- 0.3%). Significant populations of CD20 positive B-cells were also identified.

conclusionThe lymphocytic infiltrate in NSIP is characterized by an elevated CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio, and is predominantly of Th1 type, with additional populations rich in B-cells. Such features are consistent with the favorable clinical course observed in patients with NSIP compared to UIP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLung Diseases, InterstitialLymphocytesMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID16287509
PMCPMC1308868
OpenAlexW2157526741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.