Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16286493›Full record

ReviewJournal of epidemiology and community health2005

The burden of food related ill health in the UK.

Mike Rayner, Peter Scarborough

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Restaurant inspection frequency: The RestoFreq Study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2017
    Trial
  7. Dietary outcomes of a community based intervention for mothers of young children: a randomised controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. A Scoping Review of Choice Architecture to Promote Healthy Nutrition in Health and Care Settings.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mike RaynerBritish Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Peter Scarborough

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo quantify the burden of ill health in the UK that can be attributed to food (the burden of food related ill health).

designReview and further analysis of the results of work concerned with estimates of the burden of disease measured as morbidity, mortality, and in financial terms and with the proportion of that burden that can be attributed to food. MAIN

resultsFood related ill health is responsible for about 10% of morbidity and mortality in the UK and costs the NHS about 6 billion pounds annually.

conclusionsThe burden of food related ill health measured in terms of mortality and morbidity is similar to that attributable to smoking. The cost to the NHS is twice the amount attributable to car, train, and other accidents, and more than twice that attributable to smoking. The vast majority of the burden is attributable to unhealthy diets rather than to food borne diseases.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Status IndicatorsCause of DeathFoodHealth Care CostsHumansMorbidityState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID16286493
PMCPMC1732963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.