Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16285337›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science

Schizophrenia in general practice: a national survey of general practitioners in Ireland.

B Gavin, W Cullen, B O'Donoghue, J C Ascencio-Lane, G Bury, E O'Callaghan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B GavinSt John of God Hospital, Dublin.
W Cullen
B O'Donoghue
J C Ascencio-Lane
G Bury
E O'Callaghan
Central Statistics Office · IESt John of God Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic schizophrenia is challenging to manage in primary care.

aimsWe sought to establish the views of General Practitioners about managing patients with chronic schizophrenia in primary care.

methodsA cross-sectional, postal survey questionnaire of a randomly selected sample of 20% of GPs was carried out.

resultsMost GPs (97.2%) have at least one person with schizophrenia attending their practice. A substantial number of GPs (22.2%) treat cases of schizophrenia without specialist input following an initial referral to psychiatric services. Almost all (88.7%) advised patients who had experienced multiple relapses to remain on medication indefinitely. One third of GPs reported that they always experience difficulties managing patients with schizophrenia in their practice. Non-adherence with prescribed medication and loss to follow-up were the commonest impediments to treatment encountered.

conclusionGPs require appropriate back up from specialist services to enable their management of chronic schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Family PracticeAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSchizophreniaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16285337
OpenAlexW2010598445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.