Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16284923›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2006

Local intracerebral administration of Paclitaxel with the paclimer delivery system: toxicity study in a canine model.

Gustavo Pradilla, Paul P Wang, Patrik Gabikian, Khan Li, Carolyn A Magee, Kevin A Walter, Henry Brem

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Multimodal delivery of irinotecan from microparticles with two distinct compartments.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gliadel for brain metastasis.Surgical neurology international · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo PradillaDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Hunterian 817, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Paul P Wang
Patrik Gabikian
Khan Li
Carolyn A Magee
Kevin A Walter
Henry Brem
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

PARACRINE CYTOKINE DELIVERY FOR BRAIN TUMOR IMMUNOTHERAPYU19CA052857 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BREM, HENRY · 1995 to 2004
$5.7M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY FOR NEUROSURGEONST32CA009574 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSMAN, STUART A · 1987 to 2012
$2.6M
ANTISF/HGF RIBOZYME TRANSFER TO BRAIN TUMORS IN VIVOF32CA083287 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, KEVIN A · 1999 to 2000
$43k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA083287NCI NIH HHS F32 CA83287NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009574NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09574NCI NIH HHS U19 CA052857NCI NIH HHS U19 CA52857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaclitaxel, a microtubule binding agent with potent anti-glioma activity in vitro, exhibits poor penetrance to the CNS when delivered systemically. To minimize toxicity and reach therapeutic concentrations in the CNS, paclitaxel was previously incorporated into biodegradable microspheres (Paclimer), and the efficacy of Paclimer was determined in a rat model of malignant glioma. In this study we report the safety of intracranial Paclimer in a canine dose escalation toxicity study to prepare its translation into clinical scenarios.

methodsTwelve normal beagle dogs underwent a right parieto-occipital craniectomy and were randomized to receive either Paclimer at 2-mg/kg (n=5), empty microspheres at 2-mg/kg (n=1), Paclimer at 20-mg/kg (n=5), or empty microspheres at 20-mg/kg (n=1). Post-operatively, dogs were observed daily for signs of neurotoxicity. Complete blood counts and plasma levels of paclitaxel were obtained weekly. CSF levels and MRI scans were obtained on days 14-120. Paclitaxel concentrations were quantified by LC-MS.

resultsAnimals treated with 20-mg/kg Paclimer had minimal paclitaxel levels in plasma (range 0-7.84 ng/ml) and CSF (range 0-1.16 ng/ml). Animals treated with 2 mg/kg Paclimer had undetectable levels of paclitaxel in plasma, CSF was not obtained to minimize animal suffering. All animals exhibited normal behavior and weight gain, and were alive post-operatively through the last day of the study (day 60-120) without signs of neurological toxicity. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity or myelosuppression. MR imaging was comparable between Paclimer animals and controls. Adverse effects included wound infections and a brain abscess, all of which responded to antibiotic therapy, and one ventriculomegaly due to communicating hydrocephalus.

conclusionsPaclimer-based delivery of paclitaxel is safe for intraparenchymal delivery at the tested doses in normal dogs.

Indexed as

BrainDrug Delivery SystemsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiocompatible MaterialsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDogsMaleMicrospheresPaclitaxelSurvivalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiocompatible MaterialsPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID16284923
PMCPMC1635008
OpenAlexW2078625247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.