Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16284416›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2005

A cross-platform freeware tool for digital reconstruction of neuronal arborizations from image stacks.

Kerry M Brown, Duncan E Donohue, Giampaolo D'Alessandro, Giorgio A Ascoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative investigations of axonal and dendritic arbors: development, structure, function, and pathology.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Morphometric, geographic, and territorial characterization of brain arterial trees.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Digital morphometry of rat cerebellar climbing fibers reveals distinct branch and bouton types.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kerry M BrownKrasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA.
Duncan E Donohue
Giampaolo D'Alessandro
Giorgio A Ascoli

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS39600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital reconstruction of neuronal arborizations is an important step in the quantitative investigation of cellular neuroanatomy. In this process, neurites imaged by microscopy are semi-manually traced through the use of specialized computer software and represented as binary trees of branching cylinders (or truncated cones). Such form of the reconstruction files is efficient and parsimonious, and allows extensive morphometric analysis as well as the implementation of biophysical models of electrophysiology. Here, we describe Neuron_ Morpho, a plugin for the popular Java application ImageJ that mediates the digital reconstruction of neurons from image stacks. Both the executable and code of Neuron_ Morpho are freely distributed (www.maths. soton.ac.uk/staff/D'Alessandro/morpho or www.krasnow.gmu.edu/L-Neuron), and are compatible with all major computer platforms (including Windows, Mac, and Linux). We tested Neuron_Morpho by reconstructing two neurons from each of the two preparations representing different brain areas (hippocampus and cerebellum), neuritic type (pyramidal cell dendrites and olivar axonal projection terminals), and labeling method (rapid Golgi impregnation and anterograde dextran amine), and quantitatively comparing the resulting morphologies to those of the same cells reconstructed with the standard commercial system, Neurolucida. None of the numerous morphometric measures that were analyzed displayed any significant or systematic difference between the two reconstructing systems.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsAxonsCell ShapeCerebellumDendritesFemaleHippocampusImage CytometryMaleNervous SystemNeuronsPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID16284416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.