ArticleCurrent genetics2005
Differential gene expression during stationary phase between amicronucleates and micronucleates of the ciliated protist, Pseudourostyla cristata.
Article in Current genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ciliates are unicellular eukaryotic organisms with two types of nuclei, the 'germline' micronucleus (MIC) and the 'somatic' macronucleus (MAC). We previously reported that when the MIC of Pseudourostyla cristata was eliminated by amputation, the resultant amicronucleate organisms exhibited a lower viability and abnormal oral structures. To gain insight into the genetic reorganization involved in or induced by removal of the MIC and the mechanism by which nuclear dimorphism was established, we investigated gene expression differences between amicronucleates and micronucleates, using suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) techniques. Approximately 250 clones from each library were screened by cDNA array dot blotting. Altogether, 22 unique genes from the forward-subtractive library (micronucleates as tester, amicronucleates as driver) and 23 unique genes from the reverse-subtractive library (micronucleates as driver and amicronucleates as tester) were shown to be differentially expressed. These 45 differentially expressed genes were found to be homologs of genes involved in various cellular processes including signal transduction, transcription, cell cycle accomplishment and general metabolism, cell structure, and stress response. We highlighted 14 genes, 7 that were unique from both the forward-subtractive and the reverse-subtractive libraries, using real time semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The characterization of these cDNAs represents a starting point in understanding the molecular mechanisms of amicronucleates disruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.