ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005
Psychotropic combination in schizophrenia.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmentation with antidepressants in schizophrenia treatment: benefit or risk.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2015Review
- Antipsychotics dosage and antiparkinsonian prescriptions.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study adjunctive medications used with antipsychotic agents in schizophrenia via comparisons of antidepressant, anxiolytic and antiparkinsonian co-prescribing.
methodIn the context of a national naturalistic prospective observational study, a database containing all the prescriptions from 100 French psychiatrists during the year 2002 was analysed. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and age over 18. A log-linear model and generalised linear mixed models were used.
resultsIn all 5,257 prescriptions for 922 patients were analysed. The proportion of patients who were prescribed an antiparkinsonian drug was 32.9%. Amisulpride, haloperidol, phenothiazines with a sedative action and depot typical antipsychotics proved more likely to be prescribed with antiparkinsonians. The frequency of antidepressant and anxiolytic prescriptions was 51.2% and 52.3%, respectively. Associations between atypical antipsychotics (except clozapine) and antidepressants were positive while associations between typical antipsychotics and antidepressants were not. There were no differences among antipsychotics for the prescription of anxiolytics.
conclusionsAtypical antipsychotics can be expected to be less likely associated with antiparkinsonians. This result is indeed found for olanzapine, clozapine and to a limited extent for risperidone. Furthermore, a trend towards a positive association between atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants appears. In view of the antidepressive action of certain atypical antipsychotics, this result is surprising. The increase in the prescriptions of anxiolytics concerns all types of antipsychotics. In view of the increase in associated medications in schizophrenia and the difficulty of estimating it in randomised trials, this study underlines the contribution of naturalistic studies on this score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.