Further restrictions for ICU research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. III. Ethics and legislation, health services research, pharmacology and toxicology, nutrition and paediatrics.Intensive care medicine · 2008
   Review
2. Common sense won: engagement from experts repealed Norwegian restrictions for ICU research.Intensive care medicine · 2007
   Article
3. 'No Time to be Lost!' Ethical considerations on consent for inclusion in emergency pharmacological research in severe traumatic brain injury in the European Union.Science and engineering ethics · 2007
   Article
4. Informed consent in clinical trials in critical care: experience from the PAC-Man Study.Intensive care medicine · 2006
   Article
5. A change in the Dutch Directive on Medical Research Involving Human Subjects strongly increases the number of eligible intensive care patients: an observational study.Intensive care medicine · 2006
   Article
6. ICU research in Denmark: difficult but possible.Intensive care medicine · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  ICU research in Denmark: difficult but possible.2006

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as