Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1628304›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research1992

Coated vesicles are implicated in the post-fusion retrieval of the membrane of rat atrial secretory granules.

T M Newman, N J Severs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T M NewmanDepartment of Cardiac Medicine, University of London, UK.
N J Severs
University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an in situ tannic acid perfusion technique, this study presents evidence that the removal of membrane components from the rat atrial secretory granule membrane after granule exocytosis is mediated by coated vesicles. When tannic acid is used to arrest the post-fusion stages of granule release, coated pit formation occurs on granule membrane, which, although continuous with the sarcolemma, is easily recognised by the membrane omega profile and the continued presence of the granule core. Tannic acid perfusion, before aldehyde fixation, allows a degree of continued cell function, and granule fusions can persist after tannic acid has reached the cell. This results in an increase in the numbers of fusion profiles and the appearance of coated pits on granule membrane at these sites. The proportion of granules with coats increases with perfusion time, suggesting that endocytotic, as well exocytotic events, may be arrested by the action of tannic acid. Coated vesicles are also involved at earlier stages of the release pathway. In other types of secretory system this is considered to represent recycling of membrane proteins as part of the maturation process of the granule. Although arrested granules exhibiting this clathrin coat could have had the coat prior to fusion, as part of the maturation process, our results show that it is more likely to represent a second stage of membrane protein recycling; the postfusion reclamation of proteins from the sarcolemma. This facet of the tannic acid perfusion procedure suggests a general method for quantifying coated pit formation during secretory granule release.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytoplasmic GranulesExocytosisHydrolyzable TanninsIntracellular MembranesMicroscopy, ElectronMuscle, Smooth, VascularRatsRats, Inbred StrainsHydrolyzable Tannins

Identifiers

PMID1628304
OpenAlexW2093279671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.